Page 1 of 1
question regrading Undertaker's Dub theme count.
Posted: November 4th, 2009, 2:20 am
by boutitbenza_69_9
should Deadman (V3) count as a dubbed theme too, i have the "Best of SmackDown, 10th Anniversary" DVD and on the DVD during the Hogan-Jericho match from 2002, there a moment when Undertaker's theme was played but turned out Undertaker wasn't there and HHH fooled Jericho and screwed him out of the WWE Undisputed Championship. anyway the theme that Taker had when this match occurred was Limp Bizkit's Rollin' (as it happened before Judgment Day 2002) but the WWE Dubbed it over with Deadman (V3), the third and final version of the Lyric free version of "You're Gonna Pay".
i'm not gonna post the theme since it's already on here anyway.
Re: question regrading Undertaker's Dub theme count.
Posted: November 4th, 2009, 3:54 am
by TEOL
There shouldn't be counts for dubs.
Re: question regrading Undertaker's Dub theme count.
Posted: November 5th, 2009, 11:45 am
by TerranRich
TEOL wrote:There shouldn't be counts for dubs.
And why not?
Re: question regrading Undertaker's Dub theme count.
Posted: November 6th, 2009, 11:48 am
by Rudo
cause It'll be more confusing...
Re: question regrading Undertaker's Dub theme count.
Posted: November 6th, 2009, 10:57 pm
by peteroshea90
You can have a seperate count for dubs
Re: question regrading Undertaker's Dub theme count.
Posted: November 7th, 2009, 10:46 am
by TEOL
For dub themes it's best to stick with titles and not counts because they won't used.
House Show theme counts can be done though because of YouTubes and actually being used. I'd take house show themes and counts over dub counts and themes anyday of the week.
It doesn't make sence to make counts of something you can't count because it wasn't used.
I think we need a poll vote on this topic now that everyone gets my point that house shows themes are more relevent now that we get captures of them every every week for both TNA and WWE than something pointless like dub counts which are impossible if one event gets released on a DVD before another and the order the real versions played was flipped compared to the order they came on DVD making all the counts wrong.
Only possible dub theme counts are IWA 2004 because they played in order on British TV.
Re: question regrading Undertaker's Dub theme count.
Posted: November 7th, 2009, 5:59 pm
by peteroshea90
Dubs are easier to get than House Show themes since they do about 200 of those shows a year and Youtube is lucky to provide maybe 10-20 of those. House Show themes calls for speculation and tends to end up in arguments.
Re: question regrading Undertaker's Dub theme count.
Posted: November 8th, 2009, 4:59 am
by TEOL
Easier to get but harder to count.
Lets say a WrestleMania butchered up DVD comes out before a Royal Rumble one and both have different dub themes on the same guy or girl?
They are not countable at all because they came out in flipped order which makes the count wrong ie. it's not worth counting dubs only posting the themes.
Re: question regrading Undertaker's Dub theme count.
Posted: November 8th, 2009, 5:57 am
by peteroshea90
So how do you count House Show themes if it's based on speculation? Its got me stuffed. Maybe we simply don't count House Show or dub theme themes. That's the easiest solution.
Re: question regrading Undertaker's Dub theme count.
Posted: November 10th, 2009, 1:29 am
by TheLostLegend
TEOL wrote:Easier to get but harder to count.
Lets say a WrestleMania butchered up DVD comes out before a Royal Rumble one and both have different dub themes on the same guy or girl?
They are not countable at all because they came out in flipped order which makes the count wrong ie. it's not worth counting dubs only posting the themes.
Just place the one from the Royal Rumble DVD above the one in the Wrestlemania DVD on the count. This means Xylot staff having to constantly edit the dub counts rather than just adding onto them though.
Re: question regrading Undertaker's Dub theme count.
Posted: November 11th, 2009, 5:58 am
by GunnerNinja
removing the numbers would be a way to solve it